Quote Originally Posted by mkemse View Post
The right to bear arm in the Unites States is guranteed by our Consitution, the only issue I have with this is that I see NOT REASON for any private citizen to own a fully autmatic assult rife, these are used only to kill notto hunt, i have ener seem as duck or deer fire back at a hunter so a standard rigfe should do just fine
I strongly disagree with those who say we also be alowed to own and bear fully or semi automtic assult riles, i know some will disagree but as most people tell you, unless you are a gun collector their is no reason to own a uzi, AK47 ect. I donot believe in guns, i do believe intheright o own one if one chooses to do so i do have a HUGE issue withhosewho own the othertype fire arm the full automtic assult rifle kind, no reason for private owner ship expect as a collection and not for actual use
Interpreting the US constitution as suporting AK47's and handguns is pretty stupid. When that was writen, the weapon refered to was a musket. That is off-course what the constitution suports, nothing else. The method of fighting with a musket is radically different than modern weapons. There's just no comparison.

I may not live in the US, but the constitution isn't very hard to read and is pretty clear.