Time, death and the universe

[thir]

What about them? They have no physical, measurable, reproducible evidence for creation. Only their holy books and wishful thinking. And even their books are contradictory and completely at odds with observable evidence. They rely on the supernatural explanation, without evidence.

Well, that was what I meant. Science aside, they still have their own version, meaning proof does not make any difference.

Or are we at cross purposes here??

[Thorne]

Well, that was what I meant. Science aside, they still have their own version, meaning proof does not make any difference.

It doesn't make any difference to them, certainly. It does make a difference to science.

The group Answers in Genesis specifically states:
"The Bible—the “history book of the universe”—provides a reliable, eye-witness account of the beginning of all things, and can be trusted to tell the truth in all areas it touches on. Therefore, we are able to use it to help us make sense of this present world. When properly understood, the “evidence” confirms the biblical account."

And in their Statement of Faith they specifically state:
"By definition, no apparent, perceived or claimed evidence in any field, including history and chronology, can be valid if it contradicts the scriptural record. Of primary importance is the fact that evidence is always subject to interpretation by fallible people who do not possess all information."
So any information which contradicts the biblical account must be wrong, because the "fallible people" at AiG have declared it to be so?